Free Web space and hosting from freehomepage.com
Search the Web

NASHVILLE SCENE 1995

          Sight Lines

          Will Radnor Lake become a big back yard?

          By Galyn Glick

          It is a typical fall Sunday at Radnor Lake State Natural Area.
          The sky is crisp and blue, the air is fresh after weekend rains,
          and the trees are just beginning to turn. Some leaves have
          already fallen on the trails, rustling as chipmunks scurry over
          them . Birds call to one another from the branches of oaks,
          hackberries and tulip poplars.

          Somewhere, in one of the hollows, a woodpecker, hunting for
          insects, jackhammers a tree. Then, for a moment, all sounds are
          drowned out as a biplane splutters overhead, violating FAA
          regulations that protect the airspace above natural areas.

          Most of the walkers and hikers around the lake don't notice the intrusion.
          The sound of an airplane is a routine part of life, a life that most of the
          6,500 people in the park on this day have come to expect.

          A part of the state park system, Radnor Lake is a so-called "protected
          area." Approximately 1,000 acres of the "fragile forest" are under the
          state's protection. Visitors to Radnor Lake may not pick the flowers,
          wander off the trails, rappel down the hil lsides, or fish for anything in the
          lake itself. Nevertheless, Radnor Lake is endangered. The fear, however,
          does not involve cutting down trees, polluting streams or trampling over
          flowers. What is in danger is, quite simply, the view.

          Country singer Eddy Arnold, who lives near Radnor Lake, recently sold a
          portion of his property to a Chicago-based development firm, McCohen
          Development. McCohen, in turn, made plans to transform the property
          into "High Ridge," a 50-acre subdivision cons isting of lots of
          approximately one acre each. Prices for the lots are expected to climb into
          the $140,000 range, with the homes themselves priced in the
          $400,000-$600,000 range.

          The property being developed faces Granny White Pike and runs parallel
          to Oman Road. However, it is the part of the property that sits on the high
          ridge and runs along the back of the new real estate development that has
          Radnor Lake regulars concerned. T he edge of the development is only a
          stone's throw from South Cove Trail, one of the most scenic hikes in the
          park.

          South Cove Trail is probably Radnor's most isolated path. Numerous
          environmentalists, not to mention the everyday park users who have a
          rabid attachment to Radnor Lake are concerned about the fate of the
          South Cove Trail, a 1.2-mile loop that rambles off from the less hilly South
          Lake Trail. Altogether, the total length of a hike on the South Lake Trial,
          in conjunction with the South Cove Trail loop, is 2.7 miles.

          The trail, which is less traveled than other trails in the park, is as rough as
          a dry creek bed. The path isn't covered with pine needles or chipped
          Christmas trees to protect it from erosion, and, in some parts, it is almost
          washed out. Here and there, park rangers have attached orange plastic
          surveyor's strips to tree limbs and bushes to mark areas that need shoring
          up.

          Other strips, other plans

          At the crest of the ridge, other strips pink ones are tied to stakes. The
          stakes are planted in a pattern and mark the property line for the High
          Ridge development. In some places, the strips, and the line they form,
          come within a mere 10 feet of the South Cove Trail.

          Some hikers fear that if the subdivision is built, their beloved South Cove
          Trail will be changed forever. But developers insist otherwise.

          "The topography along Radnor Lake precludes any building right next to
          the trail," says Howard Weiner, a representative of McCohen
          Development. "What we have suggested is that we will preclude building
          right up to the trail. We expect all of the homes to be no more than
          midway up that hill. The cost of putting up a foundation on that land would
          be prohibitive to most homeowners, and we will supplement that with a
          prohibitive clause."

          Nevertheless, some Radnor regulars maintain that, whether the houses are
          10 feet or 200 feet away from the trail, the sense of isolation, of being in
          the wilderness, will be lost. They argue that protecting the view is as
          important as protecting the lake itself. In 1993 a similar argument helped
          prevent Cellular One from building a tower on a hill adjacent to the
          Radnor Natural Area.

          Cellular One had planned to build a $1 million cellular phone tower
          on a hill, just off Oman Road, near Vanderbilt's Dyer Observatory. At the
          time, Becky Meagher, a Friends of Radnor Lake board member, told the
          Scene that "the silver lining to this issue, if there is one, is [that] it's waking
          people up to the fact that Radnor still can be harmed." Public outcry over
          the potential eyesore forced the company to change its plans, and the
          tower was never built.

          Meagher says that the High Ridge subdivision is a reminder that the lake
          is still endangered. "You go to Radnor Lake to get away from it all," she
          says. If the property is developed, she insists, "you would see directly into
          someone's backyard. Housing d evelopments squeeze the core and affect
          the boundaries of the area. Deer and other animals don't understand
          boundaries, so you'll see more of them getting killed."

          Already, deer routinely forage for food on lawns near the property. For
          the first time in 15 years, says a park ranger, a pet dog recently killed a
          deer. The ranger predicts that such incidents will be more common, once
          homeowners move into High Ridge.

          Mike Carlton, manager of Radnor Lake, says that, although the subdivision
          could pose problems, he doesn't see the development as a crisis for the
          natural area. "It's not a watershed issue for Radnor Lake," he says. "But it
          is a management issue. It would affect the trails, and it might be a
          watershed issue for Otter Creek [which feeds into Radnor Lake]."

          Carlton says that the Nature Conservancy, a nationwide organization
          dedicated to protecting wilderness areas, is involved in discussions with
          the developer. If there's a way the Conservancy can help, he says, he's
          sure they will. But at least one source at the Conservancy expressed fears
          as to whether there is anything that can be done. The property has been
          sold and is not considered a environmental threat to the lake. Meanwhile,
          work has already started at the development. Bulldozers have scraped
          away trees, and culverts have been dug.

          What kind of environmentalism?

          In an odd way, the concern over the High Ridge development mirrors the
          crisis that gave birth to the Radnor Lake Natural Area in 1971.

          The drive to protect the area began when a developer obtained rights to
          build condominiums on the lake. Citizens rallied to save the area and
          succeeded in convincing the government to intervene. Soon, Radnor Lake
          was named Tennessee's first State Natural Area.

          Although the 85-acre lake was originally built by L&N railroad to maintain
          its rail yards in 1914, Radnor and the area surrounding it had been
          maintained in pristine condition. "Words are no match for such sensuous
          impressions," John Egerton wrote in the introduction to John Netherton's
          Radnor Lake: Nashville's Wal-den. "That story of Radnor Lake, the
          story of its mystery and its majesty, is best received through the
          experience of going there in person."

          Hundreds of thousands of visitors have taken Egerton's advice. Each year
          the natural beauty of the lake attracts more than 900,000 people to its
          trails. It's no wonder, then, that people would want to live in such
          idyllic surroundings. With careful planning, developers say, the
          construction won't affect the people who come to Radnor Lake to get
          away from it all.

          None of the lots at High Ridge has been sold yet, and the threat of upscale
          housing approximately 200 feet from South Cove Trail has failed to
          produce any concrete action to halt the development. Becky Meagher
          protests that the area's "viewscape" will be affected, but she is frank in
          acknowledging that Friends of Radnor Lake isn't doing enough to protect
          the area.

          Part of the problem, simply, is money. While Friends of Radnor Lake, the
          citizen-based group that raises money to protect the area, has $100,000 in
          the bank from a fundraiser at Hard Rock Cafe's opening in 1994, the
          money can't buy very much. "It's just sitting there in the bank," Meagher
          says. "The money's not enough to buy property, but it is enough to get
          some organization [in] there." Meanwhile, time marches on, and the
          property keeps getting more and more valuable as development pressures
          increase.

          All of Radnor Lake's champions acknowledge that the ideal solution would
          be for the natural area to include more of the land that surrounds it. But
          with land costs so high, acquisition becomes almost impossible. "There are
          three or four tracts that we'd like to purchase," says Carlton. But he fears
          that, if Friends of Radnor Lake were successful in a widely publicized
          fund drive, landowners might raise prices even higher. "You don't want
          people to think you have deep pockets, because we don't," Carlton says.

          McCohen's Howard Weiner argues that, since land prices are prohibitive,
          Radnor Lake should not concentrate on land acquisition. "Rather than
          have Radnor use their precious funds for buying land," says Weiner, "they
          should take the time to talk to us and help us work out a way to situate the
          houses in such a way that they don't have an impact on the trail. That
          way, they'd have the best of both worlds." Such cooperation, Weiner says,
          would result in "a win-win situation." His company, he insists, is "ope n to
          anything."